Most Absurd Domestic Violence Ever?

Each and every sentence of this article gets more and more absurd and it forces you to re-read it several times until you can figure out what the fuck is going on, who is breaking parole, who is in anger management classes, what the charges were, why is he banging his wife if he is estranged from her, and what in the sam hell a tri-state woman is?

Ok, so the first question most would ask after comprehending the sentence, "he was reaching for something on the nightstand when the pistol went off, hitting his estranged wife Carolyn in the upper chest" is, was he reaching for the gun? I think not. I think the gun was in this dude's hand as he was tagging his wife (that scene is just downright ri-goddamn-diculous). Of course, there is the possibility that he shot her a la Rocco shot his girlfriend's cat in Boondock Saints. Which, of course, would have been equally mind blowing.

But when you get beyond the sex pistols you start wondering what kind of Cro-Magnon relationship did these two people have? They were estranged. He had beaten her before and gone to jail for it. But his charge for shooting his wife was "for violating a civil protection order that Carolyn had taken out against him earlier this year." Huh? NOT for shooting his wife?!?!

One would think that the fact that a man who was arrested for violating a restraining order by inserting his penis into his wife (whom he had previously beaten) while a loaded gun was at the VERY LEAST within arm's distance of him, that he essentially raped her.

Aye, but there's the rub! The dude's bond was set at 75k "due to alleged prohibited contact between the parties." WTF? They make it sound like she she invited him over? Shit, if you invite a guy over for sex who used to beat you and who you already have a restraining order on...if you get shot, you get shot.